From voluntary to mandatory: the EU Digital Product Passport timeline for fashion

From voluntary to mandatory: the EU Digital Product Passport timeline for fashion

When we launched GO TRACE, traceability in fashion was a choice. Forward-thinking brands used it to differentiate themselves, to build trust with conscious consumers, and — increasingly — to understand their own supply chains. It was a competitive edge, not a compliance item.

That era is ending.

The EU’s Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) is now in force, and it introduces the Digital Product Passport (DPP) as a future mandatory requirement for products sold in Europe. Textiles is a priority sector. In the coming years, every garment sold on the European market will need to carry verified data about its materials, origins, environmental impact, and end-of-life options.

What a small group of brands championed voluntarily is becoming law. This article sets out what ESPR and the DPP are, why textiles is being prioritised, and what fashion teams should be doing now to prepare.

The voluntary era — and why it’s ending

For most of the last decade, traceability in fashion was a story of self-selection. Brands that cared invested; brands that didn’t, didn’t. The information reaching consumers was uneven, often unverifiable, and sometimes actively misleading. Greenwashing was widespread because there was no common standard against which claims could be tested.

What the EU has done with the ESPR is remove that optionality. It has moved from asking brands to disclose what they choose, to requiring them to disclose what regulators specify — in a machine-readable format, tied to each individual product.

What the ESPR actually is

The Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation is the successor to the older Ecodesign Directive, which historically covered energy-related products. The ESPR widens its scope dramatically: it applies to nearly all physical goods placed on the EU market, and it empowers the European Commission to set product-specific sustainability and information requirements through delegated acts.

The Digital Product Passport is the primary mechanism through which those information requirements will be delivered. A DPP is a structured digital record — accessible via a data carrier such as a QR code — that travels with the product through its lifecycle. It makes verified information available to regulators, supply chain actors, recyclers, repairers, and consumers.

Crucially, the DPP is not a single document. It is a framework. The exact fields, data granularity, and access rules will differ product by product, set out in the delegated acts that follow the regulation.

Why textiles was prioritised

The European Green Deal’s Circular Economy Action Plan (CEAP) identified textiles as one of the sectors where circular-economy interventions would deliver the greatest impact. The reasons are well documented: the industry’s high material throughput, low reuse and recycling rates, the volume of textile waste entering landfill and incineration, and the environmental footprint of the supply chains that produce clothing.

That prioritisation has translated into concrete regulatory attention. Textiles is among the first product groups for which detailed DPP requirements are being shaped. Brands that familiarise themselves with the framework now — and begin preparing their data, their suppliers, and their internal processes — will be the ones leading when it becomes mandatory, rather than scrambling.

The Digital Product Passport in practice

In practice, a textile DPP is expected to include information across several dimensions:

  • Product identity — who made it, where, when, and to what specification
  • Material composition — the fibres, chemicals, and components used, and their origins
  • Environmental performance — carbon footprint, water use, and other lifecycle indicators
  • Durability and repairability — how long the product is designed to last and how it can be maintained
  • End-of-life options — how the product can be reused, repaired, recycled, or disposed of responsibly
  • Compliance and due diligence — evidence of legal and ethical sourcing

The exact fields and formats are still being finalised, but the direction is clear: the data has to be verifiable, interoperable, and accessible. It is not enough to hold the information internally. It has to be discoverable at the product level by anyone with the right to see it.

Where we are on the timeline

The ESPR entered into force in 2024. The delegated acts that will specify textile-specific DPP requirements are being developed through consultation and stakeholder engagement. Timelines for specific product categories will be confirmed in those acts — but the direction and the intent are not in doubt.

For brands, the practical question is not whether the DPP will apply, but when, and in what form. Waiting for full clarity before acting is a strategy that leaves very little runway. The underlying data work — mapping your supply chain, identifying information gaps, negotiating data-sharing terms with suppliers — takes months or years, not weeks.

What this means for brands

Three shifts are worth naming.

First, compliance is becoming a data problem. The challenge is less about making sustainability claims and more about being able to back them up with structured, traceable data that your systems, and your suppliers’ systems, can produce reliably.

Second, suppliers are now part of the compliance perimeter. You cannot produce a DPP without information from the tiers below you. That means relationships, contracts, and data exchanges need to evolve.

Third, transparency stops being a marketing asset. When information is mandatory and standardised, the differentiator moves from whether you disclose to how well your product performs on the disclosed metrics.

How to prepare

Preparation is not a single project. It is a set of parallel tracks:

  • Understand the framework. Read the ESPR. Follow the delegated acts as they emerge. Track the CIRPASS initiative and the UN/CEFACT work on textile traceability.
  • Audit your current data. What do you already hold? Where are the gaps? What is verified and what is asserted?
  • Engage your supply chain. The data you’ll need lives with your suppliers. Start the conversation early.
  • Choose technology cautiously. There are many DPP platforms competing for attention. Interoperability with emerging EU data-space standards matters more than feature breadth.
  • Build internal capability. DPP readiness cuts across sustainability, product development, sourcing, legal, and IT. It is not a job for any single function.

Our mission at GO TRACE has not changed: more traceability, for responsible fashion. What has changed is that the law is catching up with what we have always believed. We built the Master Digital Product Passports for Fashion & Textiles course precisely to help fashion professionals turn this shift from an obligation into an advantage — with a clear view of the regulation, the data, the supply chain, and the technology choices ahead.